CO129-372 - Public Offices - 1910 — Page 39

mark

تون

not reprisked to in England Japan I a Hang King merchant but repsfeed in

in Aluna.

the Golay & used by hin

Then unter the

Butish Commular

Courution

Courts in

the

Cluna sady

ютеб

Кам

alternative no opportunity

refi

ģ

a-

samy

that

3

appreciate

min wh

$755

I think that

did not

37

pant when o

bikel

mah

mae

confused

hut to protect the Japanese merchant-

in Clima

i... & protulit the Hong Kong

merchant from using

a work when he

had used for years patathy bad and of which had been quite afperspirated G

the Inpanes.

Same columns

the H. K. merchant

proket kimself of reposting

Could

his mask in

Convention

lut

Пра Japan under the

this could not h

Ime where the Shoe Samme or a

Similar mark was

ya Japanese

Conerit

Sut

epiked line

In that cause.

an probatio from Japan

courts in China

Нела

amission

of Hong King from the

Correntia (or it's inclusion-

can't prevent this

to me

It seem

that from the pant of

view of Stang King

ke

the conclusion

of the convidim is most dangerous.

عله ها

this complex matter unders

have the it disussed at a

comprence

and suggeste

that representations of the

TB J T.

sad confer

M

пи Сек

with

am

thus gi

the matter

the assistan

биат 7. duyard who

༨.........

will for here soon

A&t

19/0

R.&.!.

1915-

ドルチェリー

A reasarath solution of the problems w. seam to te Ардості that I megold in para 3 of the China trous

letters of 7 January 1910 | suela on 51551.

of is certain that it hang, must not be excluded fram

the Convention if it honey marks are

prestaction from Japanese piracy in China

Sie I Hopewood

? Proceed as proposed

Jofree

Itis

द्भू

من

JR. Hquestion

very diffrent wige 716